Law enforcement in collusion with the courts has come up with a system of operation by which the peoples constitutional protection from unreasonable search is circumvented. Forgoing discussion of how issuance and execution of a search warrant is supposed to work I will describe the way search is worked. The operation depends on the layering of our court system, the fact that our system of criminal justice also includes the Grand Jury and how the jury works.
Assuming law enforcement suspects someone is committing a crime the officers apply to the District Court for a Search Warrant, which the court grants. The warrant is executed, property seized, persons arrested and detained, housed in jail and a court date set. Interestingly, the first thing Law Enforcement does, through the District Attorney's office, is dismiss the charges. However the seized property is not returned, instead it is presented to the Grand Jury which has no restraints upon it where or how the evidence presented was obtained. Since the Grand Jury is run by the District Attorney, and only hears and sees the evidence the DA wants them to see, an indictment is almost always returned. All Grand Jury Indictments are returned into Circuit Court which is superior to the District Court.
The benefit of the above described legal shell game to Law Enforcement is this: Any right the defendant had to challenge the correctness of the search warrant or the Affiant's testimony on which the lower court issued the Search Warrant is circumvented; the charges are now by Grand Jury Indictment, not based on the fruit of a probably seriously flawed Search Warrant. No matter the evidence presented to the Jury is inadmissible under the rules of court, the Grand Jury rules make no exclusions of any kind about what evidence the Jury may hear, consider, and indict on.
What the above branches of government have done, are doing, is paramount to nullifying the citizens Constitutionally Guaranteed Protection from Unreasonable Search and Seizure of home and property.